Zimbabwe Assessment
1. FAIR
JUSTICE
1.1 Judicial system capability.
In 2006, Justice Rita
Makarau described Zimbabwe's prison conditions as "embarrassing and disturbing"
because she had visited Harare Central Prison and met ten people who had been
incarcerated for up to ten years without trial. She quite rightly said, "We have
no excuse for this delay - it is imperative prisoners who deserve to be released
should not stay here. 1
Like many in the civil service, magistrates have resigned in large numbers to find better jobs; building longer delays into the system and exacerbating an already severe problem, with tragic consequences for those on remand. [i]
The constitution provides for the right to a fair trial; however, this right frequently was compromised in practice due to political pressures. Defendants enjoy a presumption of innocence under the law; however, this was not always preserved in practice. 2
(see also 1.1 Human Rights or 1.1 Recommendations)
1.2 Legal assistance to
persons living in poverty.
Every
defendant has the right to a lawyer of his or her choosing, but a local attorney
reported that most defendants in magistrates' courts did not have legal
representation. In criminal cases an indigent defendant may apply to have the
government provide an attorney, but this was rarely granted except in capital
cases, where the government provided an attorney for all defendants unable to
afford one.[ii]
The
majority of Zimbabween prisoners are very poor and cannot
afford legal
representation, which means - regardless of whether they are innocent or guilty
- they have to wait their
turn for legal help. Waiting your turn for legal representation can mean upwards
of two years in jail before they get their day in court. 1
(see also 1.2 Human Rights or 1.2 Recommendations)
1.3 Justice for women and Juveniles.
Domestic violence against women, especially wife-beating, continued to be a serious problem. In 2006 the Musasa Project, a local NGO that worked for the protection and promotion of women's rights, reported that approximately one-third of women in the country were in an abusive marital relationship. Most cases of domestic violence went unreported due to traditional sensitivities and fear of economic consequences for the family. Authorities generally considered domestic violence to be a private matter and usually only arrested an offender for assault if there was physical evidence of abuse. On October 25, the government enacted the Domestic Violence Act, which criminalizes domestic violence and provides enhanced protection for victims of abuse; the act was viewed as a milestone by women's rights groups 2
Child abuse, including incest, infanticide, child abandonment, and rape continued to be serious problems during the year. The local NGO Girl Child Network reported cases of child sexual abuse had increased during the year. Anecdotal evidence suggested that a relative or someone who lived with the child was the most common abuser. 2
During the 2005 Operation Restore Order, the government detained many street
children and took them to transit camps or juvenile detention centers. At year's
end NGOs were uncertain how the operation affected the number of children living
on the streets, which in previous years had risen dramatically. One local child
welfare advocacy group reported that the continuing economic decline and the
government's lack of support to social welfare institutions contributed to a
noticeable rise in the estimated 12,000 street children throughout the country.
NGOs operated training centers and homes for street children and orphans, and
government officials referred children to these centers. 2
Trafficking was a serious problem. Rural children were trafficked into farms or
cities for agricultural labor, domestic servitude, and commercial sexual
exploitation, often under the false pretenses of job or marriage proposals,
according to one NGO. Reports suggested that those children in desperate
economic circumstances, especially those in families headed by children, were
most at risk. Women and children were reportedly trafficked for sexual
exploitation in towns along the borders with the four surrounding countries.
There were also reports that young women and girls were lured to South Africa,
the People's Republic of China, Egypt, the United Kingdom, Canada, and Zambia
with false employment offers that resulted in involuntary domestic servitude or
commercial sexual exploitation. Women and children from the Democratic Republic
of the Congo, Malawi, Mozambique, and Zambia were trafficked through the country
to South Africa. Small numbers of South African girls were trafficked to the
country for forced domestic labor. 2
Victims suffering from child or domestic abuse were treated with special
procedures in victim-friendly courts, and trafficked persons had the option to
take cases before such courts. Local immigration and social services officials
referred trafficking victims to NGO-funded centers. Save the Children Norway
also offered shelter and referrals for medical attention at the IOM reception
center in Beitbridge for unaccompanied children and trafficking victims. 2
(see also 1.3 Human Rights or 1.3 Recommendations)
1.5 Arbitrary or severe penalties.
The
constitution and law prohibit arbitrary arrest and detention; however, some laws
effectively weakened this prohibition, and security forces repeatedly
arbitrarily arrested and detained persons. 2
The government increasingly used arbitrary arrest and detention as a tool of intimidation and harassment, especially against opposition members and supporters, civil society activists, student activists, and journalists. The Zimbabwe Human Rights NGO Forum reported over 1,600 cases of unlawful arrest and detention during the year. According to the Solidarity Peace Trust and Institute for Justice and Reconciliation report Policing the State, an evaluation of 1,981 politically-motivated arrests in the country from 2000 to 2005 showed that 1,721 cases resulted in no trial, 256 cases came to trial but resulted in no conviction, and only four cases resulted in a conviction. This trend continued during the year. 2
“Anybody that is going into prison for any sustained length of time and does not have family who have the means to support them and come and visit them in prison and bring them food, those people are going to die – because the diet that is there nobody can live on". 1
(see also 1.5 Human Rights)
2.PRISON SYSTEMS BASICS
(see also 2.0 Recommendations)
2.1 Structure.
The introduction of
community service within the criminal justice system of Zimbabwe
played a significant role in relieving the
country of the costly expenses it was incurring
in maintaining offenders in prisons. It
further helped in solving the problem of
overcrowding. Mukemo[iii]
stated that about 17500 offenders benefited from
community service programmes from 1993 to
2000, and 90% completed their punishments.
3.
PROTECTION OF INCARCERATED PERSONS
3.2 Abuse of incarcerated persons.
Last year, in a confidential report
written for Paradzayi Zimondi, senior prison officials noted that at
least 900 inmates had died in the Mashonaland Region alone, pointing out that
more people had died in Zimbabwean prisons
in 2008 than any other year. This massive death toll is directly
attributable to neglect and gross mismanagement; their terrible human
suffering derives from an unacceptable
tolerance within the prison services (traced right up to those in senior
positions) for the criminal and inhumane treatment of human beings. 1
Zimbabwe's prisoners are suffering untold horrors in Zimbabwe's jails. The State is condemning them to slow starvation and possible death from nutrition-related illnesses or the vast array of other diseases they are exposed to through unhygienic conditions. Despite terrible desperation, their position as 'prisoners' means they are denied the most basic human instinct and that is to fight for survival: inmates can't beg for food from passers-by, they can't forage for wild berries in the bush, and they can't rummage through dustbins for waste food. Because of this, Zimbabwe's prisons constitute a unique and especially cruel form of torture that has both physical and psychological impacts on the people affected.1
(see also 3.2 Human Rights or 3.2 Recommendations)
4. HEALTH SERVICES FOR INCARCERATED PERSONS
4.1 Health Care.
Poor sanitary conditions persisted, which
aggravated outbreaks of cholera, diarrhea, measles, tuberculosis, and
HIV/AIDS‑related illnesses. 2
In 2004, when we first wrote about the conditions in Zimbabwe's prisons,
a prison officer told us that tuberculosis (TB), an opportunistic disease,
spread like wildfire through the cells with an average of 15 prisoners dying
each week from the disease. In March 2004, 130
people died from TB at Khami Prison in a
single month. Those who are HIV positive and have compromised immune
systems are particularly susceptible to getting TB. 1
Cholera is a disease that thrives in unsanitary conditions, passed on through bacteria found in human feces; and it is contagious: one gram of feces can contain 10 million viruses, one million bacteria, one million parasite cysts and a hundred worm eggs. One of the first things that most people comment on when they describe Zimbabwe's prison cells is the overwhelming stench of human urine and excrement.
Those who have been severely beaten by the police and have fractures and other injuries, are routinely denied any access to health care or medication for varying period of time. 2
Prisons have struggled for food supplies for several years now. A policeman told reporters in 2006: "We give [prisoners] sadza and matemba (dried fish) boiled in water once every day in the afternoon, when resources are available". In June 2006, MP Claudius Makova told parliament that some inmates at Highlands police station were going for two days without food. In 2008, things were much worse: a confidential report written for Paradzayi Zimondi advised him that prisoners at Chikurubi Prison went for days without a meal and were occasionally supplied with food "only meant to keep a person alive" such as sadza and salted, unclean water.1
(see also 4.1 Human Rights or
4.1 Recommendations)
6. SOCIAL
RIGHTS OF INCARCERATED PERSONS
6.2 Visitation.
The law provides that international human rights monitors have the right to visit prisons, but government procedures and requirements made it very difficult to do so. The government granted local NGOs access on a number of occasions during the year. 2
(see also 6.2 Human Rights or 6.2 Recommendations)
[i] Sokwanele, http://www.sokwanele.com/articles/sokwanele/zimbabwesprisonsaredeathtraps_31march_310309
[ii] U.S. country reports, http://www.state.gov/g/drl/rls/hrrpt/2008/af/119032.htm
[iii] Mukemo, C.W. (2000). Justification for the introduction of Community Service in Uganda. (Diploma thesis) Department of Law. Law Development Centre, Makerere Uganda-Kampala.
[iv] Charles Birungi, “Community Service in Uganda as an Alternative to Imprisonment,” University of the Western Cape, 2005, http://etd.uwc.ac.za/usrfiles/modules/etd/docs/etd_init_3844_1177065474.pdf